Marriage of Mumma and Rosenfield CA1/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 27, 2013A134292California1,482 words

Opinion

Opinion

Jenkins, J.

Filed 9/27/13 Marriage of Mumma and Rosenfield CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

In re the Marriage of REBECCA MUMMA and DON ROSENFIELD.

REBECCA MUMMA,

Appellant, v. A134292 DON ROSENFIELD, (San Francisco County Appellant. Super. Ct. No. FDI-04-757877)

Rebecca Mumma appeals from a November 22, 2011, order denying her request for a downward modification of spousal support in favor of Don Rosenfield. She asserts the court erred as a matter of law by refusing to consider her loss of tax deductions after the sale of the marital residence as a factor impacting her ability to pay spousal support. We agree…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.