In re D.A. CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 27, 2013C071532California1,855 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 9/27/13 In re D.A. CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(San Joaquin) ----

In re D.A., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.

THE PEOPLE, C071532

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 68386)

v.

D.A.,

Defendant and Appellant.

Minor D.A., age 16, admitted an allegation that he had committed first degree burglary. In exchange, a related allegation was dismissed along with an unrelated petition that alleged a different burglary and related offenses that involved different victims. The dismissal was entered with the understanding that, if the minor “caused injury or damages to anyone, [he] will be required to pay them back and that is called restitution.” At a restitution hearing, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.