In re B.J. CA1/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 27, 2013A137904California2,288 words

Opinion

Opinion

Jenkins, J.

Filed 9/27/13 In re B.J. CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

In re B.J., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.

ALAMEDA COUNTY SOCIAL

SERVICES AGENCY,

Plaintiff and Respondent, v. A137904 T.M., (Alameda County Defendant and Appellant. Super. Ct. No. OJ12019488)

T.M. (hereafter mother) appeals from a February 14, 2013 jurisdictional and dispositional order, which provided that T.J., as the child‟s presumed father, was entitled to family reunification services.1 On appeal mother argues the evidence was insufficient to support the court‟s finding that T.J. was the child‟s presumed father based on the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.