San Miguel Community Ass'n v. State Farm General Insurance

Good Law
163 Cal. Rptr. 3d 358·220 Cal. App. 4th 798
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 1, 2013G047738California5,370 words

Opinion

Opinion

Rylaarsdam, J.

Question: When an insurance company issues a liability policy, agreeing to indemnify its insured against a third party claim for damages covered under the policy, and to defend the insured against any such claim, does the insurer have a duty to defend the insured against a third party lawsuit seeking injunctive relief but no compensatory damages? Answer: No. The third party’s failure to seek compensatory damages against the insured means the dispute is not a claim for damages under the policy. The insurer’s defense obligation requires it to provide the insured with a defense against a claim seeking damages potentially payable under the policy, not to defend the insured’s honor or otherwise assist it in resolving a nonmonetary dispute.

Here, appellants San Miguel Community Association and William Beggs sued State Farm General Insurance Company, alleging it breached obligations to them under a liability insurance policy by refusing to reimburse them for the cost of defending the early stages of a lawsuit in which the plaintiffs had initially sought only injunctive relief to enforce parking restrictions within the community, plus an award of punitive damages. When the third…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.