Langston

Langston v. South Coast Towing CA2/5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 2013B241405California5,936 words

Opinion

Opinion

Mosk, J.

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff and appellant Allan Langston (plaintiff) brought an action on behalf of himself and a class against defendants and respondents South Coast Towing, Inc.1 (South Coast) and Tamar Ohayan (Ohayan) (collectively South Coast or defendants) based on defendants‘ alleged operation of a scheme in which they offered persons attending events (in plaintiff‘s case, a USC football game) to pay to park in private lots and, after the lots were full, posting ―No Parking‖ signs, towing the vehicles, and charging the vehicles‘ owners a fee to redeem their vehicles. The complaint alleged three causes of action for violation of the unfair competition law (UCL) (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 17200 (section 17200)) premised on theories of unlawful, unfair, and fraudulent conduct; and causes of action for false advertising (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 17500 (section 17500)), elder and dependent financial abuse (Welf. & Inst. Code, §§ 15610.07, 15610.23, 15610.25 & 15610.30),2 fraud, and violation of the Consumer Legal Remedies Act (CLRA) (Civ. Code, § 1750 et seq.). The trial court sustained without leave to amend defendants‘ demurrer to all of plaintiff‘s causes of action except his causes of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.