In re I.M. CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 1, 2013E058647California3,570 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 10/1/13 In re I.M. CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

In re I.M., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY E058647

CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES,

(Super.Ct.No. J233243) Plaintiff and Respondent,

OPINION

v.

A.M.,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. Cheryl C. Kersey,

Judge. Affirmed.

Megan Turkat-Schirn, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant

and Appellant.

1 Jean-Rene Basle, County Counsel, and Jamila Bayati, Deputy County Counsel, for

Plaintiff and Respondent.

A.M. (mother) appeals from an order terminating parental rights to her preschool-

aged son I.M. (sometimes child). She argues that the juvenile court should have…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.