Angol

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff and appellant Martha Angol (plaintiff) appeals from the trial court’s order sustaining demurrers to some, but not all, of the causes of action against most, but not all, of the defendants and respondents. 1 In response to the appeal, defendants argue, inter alia, that because a judgment or order of dismissal has not been entered, plaintiff has appealed from a nonappealable order. We hold that as to the two institutional defendants, Community College and Trade Technical, the appeal must be dismissed as taken from a nonappealable order because no judgment of dismissal has been entered in favor of those defendants. As to the individual defendants, the appeal must be dismissed because no judgment of dismissal can be entered in their favor until all pending causes of action against them have been resolved.

PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Plaintiff filed a second amended complaint against defendants asserting the following causes of action against the following defendants: a first cause of action against all of the individual defendants—Bly, Radcliff, Lagos, Lawrence, and Burke- Kelly—for fraud; a second cause of action against all defendants for intentional infliction…