United States v. Margarito Flores-Cordero

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 4, 201312-10220California176 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 12-10220 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 4:11-cr-02432-CKJ-

GEE-

MARGARITO FLORES-

CORDERO, ORDER AMENDING

Defendant-Appellant. OPINION

Filed October 4, 2013

Before: Mary M. Schroeder and Consuelo M. Callahan, Circuit Judges, and Sarah S. Vance, Chief District Judge.*

ORDER

The Opinion filed July 25, 2013, appearing at 723 F.3d 1085, is amended as follows:

1. At slip op. 4, in the first sentence of the second full paragraph; 723 F.3d at 1086, line 2 of the third full paragraph, insert “or risk” between the words “application” and “of.”

* The Honorable Sarah S. Vance, Chief United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Louisiana, sitting by designation. UNITED STATES V. FLORES-CORDERO

2. At slip op. 8, in the first sentence of the second full paragraph; 723 F.3d at 1088, line 4 of the second full paragraph, delete the word “serious.”

With these amendments, the panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing.

The petition for panel rehearing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.