Diaz v. First American Home Buyers Protection Corp.

Good Law
732 F.3d 948·2013 WL 5495702·86 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1028·2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 20327
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 4, 201311-57239California2,946 words

Opinion

Opinion

Fisher, J.

Emily Diaz, the owner of a home warranty plan from First American Home Buyers Protection Corporation, filed a class action complaint alleging that First American refused to make timely repairs, used substandard contractors and wrongfully denied claims. She asserted state law claims for unfair competition, misrepresentation, concealment, breach of contract and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. The district court dismissed Diaz’s unfair competition and concealment claims under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Following denial of class certification, First American made an offer of judgment on Diaz’s remaining individual claims pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 68. When Diaz did not accept the offer, First American moved to dismiss these claims for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Agreeing that First American’s unaccepted Rule 68 offer rendered Diaz’s remaining claims moot, the district court dismissed the claims under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1), entering judgment in favor of neither party. Diaz appealed.

We vacate the district court’s dismissal of Diaz’s remaining individual claims. We hold that an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.