Mid-Century Ins. Co. v. Zamora CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 4, 2013C069644California2,997 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 10/4/13 Mid-Century Ins. Co. v. Zamora CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(San Joaquin) ----

MID-CENTURY INSURANCE COMPANY, C069644

Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and (Super. Ct. No. 39-2009-00222363- Respondent, CU-IC-STK)

v.

ROBERT ZAMORA et al.,

Defendants, Cross-complainants and Appellants.

In this action with cross-prayers for declaratory relief regarding the obligation of plaintiff Mid-Century Insurance Company (Mid-Century) to defend eight defendant car dealerships and their principal (to whom we will refer only collectively as defendants) in an underlying action for wage/hour violations of state and federal law, the trial court concluded potential coverage did not exist…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.