The People v. Phetchamphone CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 4, 2013F064548California9,511 words

Opinion

Opinion

INTRODUCTION

Appellant/defendant Tony Phetchamphone (defendant) was charged and convicted after a jury trial in the Superior Court of Fresno County of committing several offenses against his father, Thonghanh Phetchamphone (Mr. Phetchamphone), during an altercation at their residence: count I, criminal threats (Pen. Code,1 § 422); count II, dissuading a witness by force or threat, with the jury finding that he used force or the threat of force on the victim‟s person or property (§ 136.1, subds. (b)(1), (c)(1)); and count III, misdemeanor battery (§ 242). Defendant had one prior serious felony conviction (§ 667, subd. (a)(1)), and one prior strike conviction (§§ 667, subds. (b)-(i) & 1170.12, subds. (a)-(d)). He was sentenced to 11 years in prison. On appeal, defendant contends his convictions for criminal threats and dissuading a witness are not supported by substantial evidence. Defendant further contends the trial court improperly permitted the prosecution to introduce evidence about his prior conviction for attempted second degree murder in Minnesota in 2002. Defendant argues the prior conviction constituted inadmissible propensity evidence and was extremely prejudicial. We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.