Anthony James Medrano v. Kevin Hixton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY JAMES MEDRANO, Case No. 2:23-cv-06431-MRA-BFM

Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING v. MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT

AND RECOMMENDATION

KEVIN HIXTON, Acting Warden, Respondent. 16 17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the records and files herein, the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, and Petitioner’s Objections to the Report and Recommendation. The Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made. The Report and Recommendation (“Report”) recommends denial of the Petition and dismissal of this action with prejudice. (ECF No. 30.) Petitioner’s Objections to the Report (ECF No. 32) do not warrant a change to the Report’s findings or recommendation. Petitioner objects that he is entitled to habeas relief for Ground One, in which he claims the trial court erred by failing to instruct the jury with…