Cathcart

Blue Line Foodservice Distribution, Inc. v. Cathcart

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 30, 20253:24-cv-01250California8,594 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BLUE LINE FOODSERVICE Case No.: 24-CV-1250-W-MMP

DISTRIBUTION, INC.,

ORDER DENYING MOTIONS TO

Plaintiff, DISMISS v. 14 JOHN CATHCART, NERYS [Doc. 3, 5]

LOGISTICS, INC., MERCATOR

CAPITAL ADVISORS, INC., Defendants. 18 Pending before the Court are two motions to dismiss under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 8, 9(b), and 12(b)(6). On September 3, 2024, Defendants John Cathcart and Mercator Capital Advisors, Inc. (“Mercator”) filed their motion. (Cathcart Mot. [Doc. 3- 1].) The same day, Defendant Nerys Logistics, Inc. (“Nerys Logistics”) filed a separate motion to dismiss. (Nerys Log. Mot. [Doc. 5-1].) Plaintiff Blue Line Foodservice Distribution, Inc. (“Blue Line”) opposed the motions. (Opp’n [Doc. 18].) Defendants separately replied. (Cathcart Reply [Doc. 21]); (Nerys Log. Reply [Doc. 23].) The Court decides the matter on the papers submitted and without oral argument. See Civ. R. 7.1(d)(1). …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.