Taylor

(HC) Blanc v. Taylor

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 30, 20251:24-cv-01212California651 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 LUKNER BLANC, Case No. 1:24-cv-01212-CDB (HC)

Petitioner, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE IN WRITING WHY

ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

v. PETITIONER’S FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH

LOCAL RULES AND TO OBEY A COURT

T. TAYLOR, ORDER

Respondent. (Docs. 5, 18)

14-DAY DEADLINE 17 Petitioner Lukner Banc (“Petitioner”) is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. (Doc. 1). On October 11, 2024, because the Court found Petitioner’s petition properly cognizable under § 2241, and the Court has jurisdiction to proceed to the merits of the petition, the Court ordered Respondent to file a response addressing the merits or seeking dismissal of the petition within 60 days of the date of service of the order. (Doc. 5 at 2). Petitioner was ordered therein to file a traverse, if any, on or before 30 days from the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.