Newsome

(HC) Kelly v. Newsome

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 30, 20251:25-cv-00085California538 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES CARL KELLY, No. 1:25-cv-00085-KES-SAB (HC) Petitioner, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING

v. PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS

CORPUS, DENYING PETITIONER’S

GALVIN NEWSOME, et al., MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY

INJUNCTION AND TEMPORARY

Respondents. RESTRAINING ORDER, DIRECTING

CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE, AND

DECLINING TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF

APPEALABILITY

17 (Docs. 3, 8) 18 Petitioner James Carl Kelly is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On February 18, 2025, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations that recommended dismissing the petition for lack of jurisdiction and denying petitioner’s motion for preliminary injunction and temporary…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.