Sandhu

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiffs Manjit Sandhu and Satinder Dhillon appeal from a judgment entered in favor of defendant Wells Fargo Bank after the trial court granted the bank‘s ex parte application to dismiss their lawsuit, following demurrers to plaintiffs‘ original and first amended complaints and denial of a motion to file a second amended complaint. We conclude the trial court properly dismissed the action, and affirm the judgment.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

In 2005, plaintiffs obtained a loan from Wells Fargo to buy a home in Hayward, California. They defaulted on the loan, and in 2011, the property was sold to Federal National Mortgage Association. Plaintiffs filed suit shortly thereafter, naming Wells Fargo and the Mortgage Association as defendants. The trial court sustained defendants‘ demurrer to the complaint, and granted plaintiffs leave to amend. The court noted at the outset of its order that plaintiffs had not opposed the court‘s tentative ruling.

1 Plaintiffs filed a first amended complaint, naming only Wells Fargo as defendant and asserting five causes of action: rescission pursuant to Civil Code section 1632,1 rescission pursuant to sections 1550, 1567, 1568,…