NeGrom

Devale Wright v. NeGrom

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 30, 20255:24-cv-01421California1,494 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DEVALE WRIGHT, Case No. 5:24-cv-01421-DSF-PD

Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING ACTION v. FOR FAILURE TO

PROSECUTE

14 NEGROM, et al., 15 Defendants.

I. Pertinent Procedural History and Plaintiff’s Claims

18 On August 15, 2024, Plaintiff Devale Wright (“Plaintiff”), who is 19 proceeding pro se, filed a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) pursuant to 42 20 U.S.C. § 1983 against Defendants NeGrom and Hilfer, custody specialists for 21 the San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department (“SBCSD”), and Sanchez 22 and Rodriguez deputies for the SBCSD, in their official capacity. [Id. at 3-4.1] 23 Plaintiff alleged that Defendants allowed him to be locked down in his cell at 24 West Valley Detention Center (“WVDC”) for more than 24 hours on numerous 25

The Court uses the page numbers inserted on the pleadings by the electronic docketing system. 28 occasions in violation of the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment. [Id. at 3-6.] He alleged…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.