Sheikh

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FIRDOS SHEIKH, No. 2:23-cv-1582 TLN SCR Plaintiff, v. ORDER ON DISCOVERY MOTION AND

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

SPINNAKER INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Defendants filed a motion to compel Plaintiff to provide complete initial disclosures concerning damages computations, as required by Rule 26(a)(1)(A)(iii), and to comply with the Court’s discovery order on the same subject (the “Discovery Motion”). ECF No. 36. However, Defendants’ counsel did not meet and confer with Plaintiff’s counsel prior to filing this motion, and persisted in pursuing the motion even after Plaintiff’s counsel served amended initial disclosures. After the parties submitted a joint statement on Defendant’s Discovery Motion (ECF Nos. 41 & 39-4), the Court heard argument on this and another discovery motion on April 24, 2025. As explained below, the Court denies the Discovery Motion and orders Defendants to show cause to why they should not be…