Bettencourt

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROSE A. ROBINSON, Case No. 2:24-cv-0760-DC-JDP (PS) Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS DENNIS BETTENCOURT, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Rose Robinson has filed a second amended complaint against Dennis Bettencourt, Costal Capital, and Wells Fargo Home Mortgage. Since her complaint continues to fail to state a claim, and plaintiff has been afforded multiple opportunities to cure the issues identified in my prior orders, I now recommend that her second amended complaint be dismissed without leave to amend. Screening and Pleading Requirements A federal court must screen the complaint of any claimant seeking permission to proceed in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). The court must identify any cognizable claims and dismiss any portion of the complaint that is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief from a defendant…