Terranova

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES SANDFORD, No. 2:24-cv-03343-DAD-CKD (PS) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING

v. PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED

COMPLAINT WITHOUT LEAVE TO

TERRANOVA, et al., AMEND Defendants. (Doc. No. 14) 16 17 Plaintiff James Sandford, proceeding pro se, initiated this civil action on December 2, 2024. (Doc. No. 1.) This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On February 6, 2025, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that plaintiff’s first amended complaint be dismissed without leave to amend due to lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (Doc. No. 14 at 3.) In particular, the magistrate judge determined that plaintiff appeared to be seeking review of a state court judgment that this court cannot exercise jurisdiction over pursuant to the Rooker-Feldman…