Shipp
Shipp v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DESHAWN SHIPP, No. 2:24-cv-02876-DAD-JDP Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
TO REMAND, DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
v. REQUEST FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES, AND
REMANDING THIS ACTION TO THE
WAL-MART ASSOCIATES, INC., et al., SACRAMENTO COUNTY SUPERIOR
COURT
Defendants. (Doc. No. 10)
17 This matter is before the court on plaintiff’s motion to remand filed on November 15, 2024. (Doc. No. 10.) On December 16, 2024, the pending motion was taken under submission on the papers. (Doc. No. 14.) For the reasons explained below, the court will grant plaintiff’s motion to remand. BACKGROUND On August 26, 2024, plaintiff filed this discrimination action against his employer, defendant Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. (“defendant Walmart”); his managers, defendants Rick Eaton and Ryan O’Riordan (“the Individual Defendants”); and unnamed Doe defendants 1–25 in the Sacramento County Superior…