Warden

(HC) Fuller v. Warden

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 30, 20252:25-cv-00781California1,428 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AHMAD RASHA FULLER, No. 2:25-cv-0781-CKD P Petitioner, v. ORDER AND WARDEN, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Respondent.

16 Petitioner Ahmad Fuller, a state prisoner, filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 and a motion requesting a stay of his criminal sentence pending habeas review. (ECF Nos. 1, 2.) Petitioner paid the filing fee. On April 4, 2025, petitioner filed a first amended petition for writ of habeas corpus, which is the operative petition under Rule 15 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts, if it plainly appears from the petition, any attached exhibits, and the record of prior proceedings that the moving party is not entitled to relief, then the district court is authorized to summarily dismiss a habeas petition. Neiss v. Bludworth, 114 F.4th 1038, 1044 (9th Cir. 2024);…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.