Cobb-Hampton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 THEODORE J. VIGIL, No. 2:25-cv-01144-DC-SCR Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION

AMYRA COBB-HAMPTON, et al., Defendants. 15 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this action, which was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). Plaintiff has filed a request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) and has submitted the affidavit required by that statute. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). The motion to proceed IFP will be granted. However, for the reasons provided below, the Court finds Plaintiff’s complaint is legally deficient and recommends that it be dismissed without leave to amend. I. SCREENING A. Legal Standard The federal IFP statute requires federal courts to dismiss a case if the action is legally “frivolous or malicious,” fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune…