Melgoza

United States v. Melgoza

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 1, 202524-4517California463 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 1 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-4517 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 1:06-cr-00253-JLT-4 v.

MEMORANDUM*

VIRGILIO MELGOZA, Jr.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Jennifer L. Thurston, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 22, 2025**

Before: GRABER, H.A. THOMAS, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.

Virgilio Melgoza Jr. appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges the 48-month sentence imposed upon the second revocation of his

supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Melgoza first contends that the district court violated his right to due process

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). by failing to inquire whether he was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.