Corrales

United States v. Corrales

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 1, 202524-4481California242 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 1 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-4481 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 4:14-cr-00099-BLW-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

EDUARDO BARRAGAN

CORRALES, AKA Eduardo Barragan- Corrales, AKA Alejandro Martinez-Zavala,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho B. Lynn Winmill, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 22, 2025**

Before: GRABER, H.A. THOMAS, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.

Eduardo Barragan Corrales appeals pro se from the district court’s order

denying his second motion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Corrales contends that the district court should have granted…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.