Lillard

Lillard v. Jacquez

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 1, 202523-4133California390 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 1 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LONNIE EUGENE LILLARD, No. 23-4133 D.C. No. Petitioner - Appellant, 3:23-cv-00026-IM v.

MEMORANDUM*

ISRAEL JACQUEZ,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Karin J. Immergut, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 22, 2025**

Before: GRABER, H.A. THOMAS, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.

Federal prisoner Lonnie Eugene Lillard appeals pro se from the district

court’s order denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C.

§ 2241 challenging prison disciplinary proceedings that resulted in the loss of good

conduct time. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C § 1291. Reviewing de novo,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). see Lane v. Salazar, 911 F.3d 942, 947 (9th Cir. 2018), we…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.