Biederman

Biederman v. FCA US LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 1, 20253:23-cv-06640California3,870 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 FRANK BIEDERMAN, et al., Case No. 23-cv-06640-JSC

Plaintiffs,

ORDER RE PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION

v. FOR RECONSIDERATION AND

MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION OF

FCA US LLC, et al., INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 102, 109

12 Plaintiffs purchased RAM 2500 and 3500 pickup trucks (“Class Trucks”) installed with alleged “defeat devices” that affected the emissions and performance of their diesel engines. In this putative class action, Plaintiffs advanced 11 causes of action against Defendants FCA US LLC and Cummins Inc. Defendants then moved to dismiss the Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint (“CAC”) in its entirety, and on February 11, 2025, the Court issued an order granting in part and denying in part those motions. (Dkt. No. 95.) Relevant to the instant motions, the Court granted Cummins’ Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ civil RICO claim, without leave to amend. (See id.) The Court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.