Hills

Hills v. City of Chula Vista

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 1, 20253:23-cv-01067California928 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No.: 23-cv-1067-DMS-DDL

MANUEL LUKE HILLS,

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ v. MOTION TO DISMISS AND STRIKE

PLAINTIFF’S FOURTH AMENDED

CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CHULA

COMPLAINT

VISTA POLICE DEPARTMENT,

OFFICER SYMONETTE, OFFICER

LOPEZ, OFFICER MARTIN, OFFICER

BANDY, SERGEANT ALVAREZ,

CHIEF ROXANA KENNEDY, AND

JOHN DOES 1 through 5, inclusive, Defendants.

20 Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss and strike Plaintiff’s Fourth Amended Complaint (FAC, ECF No. 60) pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) & (f) and Civil L.R. § 7.1.f.3.a. & c. Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, did not file an opposition to Defendants’ motion. The background of this case will not be repeated as it was extensively discussed in the Court’s prior Order granting and denying in part Defendants’…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.