Hills
Hills v. City of Chula Vista
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 1, 20253:23-cv-01067California928 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No.: 23-cv-1067-DMS-DDL
MANUEL LUKE HILLS,
Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ v. MOTION TO DISMISS AND STRIKE
PLAINTIFF’S FOURTH AMENDED
CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CHULA
COMPLAINT
VISTA POLICE DEPARTMENT,
OFFICER SYMONETTE, OFFICER
LOPEZ, OFFICER MARTIN, OFFICER
BANDY, SERGEANT ALVAREZ,
CHIEF ROXANA KENNEDY, AND
JOHN DOES 1 through 5, inclusive, Defendants.
20 Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss and strike Plaintiff’s Fourth Amended Complaint (FAC, ECF No. 60) pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) & (f) and Civil L.R. § 7.1.f.3.a. & c. Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, did not file an opposition to Defendants’ motion. The background of this case will not be repeated as it was extensively discussed in the Court’s prior Order granting and denying in part Defendants’…