(PC) Hilson v. Lynch

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 1, 20251:23-cv-01757California428 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RASHEED HILSON, SR., Case No. 1:23-cv-01757 JLT GSA (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

v. (Doc. 11) JEFF LYNCH, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a former state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On April 3, 2025, after the Court’s screening order (Doc. 8) and an order to show cause re failure to prosecute (Doc. 9) were returned to sender after service upon Plaintiff at his address of record, the magistrate judge issued Findings and Recommendations to dismiss the action for failure to prosecute and failure to keep the Court apprised of his current address.1 (Doc. 11.) After evaluating the factors articulated in Malone v. United States Postal Service, 833 F.2d 128, 130 (9th Cir. 1987), the Findings and Recommendations recommended dismissal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.