Macomber

(PC) Cramer v. Macomber

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 1, 20251:23-cv-01712California3,090 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8 9 JAMES CRAMER, Case No. 1:23-cv-01712 KES EPG (PC) 10 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT PLAINTIFF’S IFP

v. STATUS BE REVOKED AND THAT

PLAINTIFF BE REQUIRED TO PAY THE

JEFF MACOMBER, et al., FILING FEE IN FULL IF HE WANTS TO

PROCEED WITH THIS ACTION

Defendants. 14 (ECF Nos. 2, 7)

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

THIRTY DAYS

16 Plaintiff James Cramer is incarcerated at California Substance Abuse Treatment Facility (CSATF) and is proceeding pro se in this action filed on December 13, 2023. (ECF No. 1). The Court screened the complaint, found that it stated no cognizable claims, and gave Plaintiff leave to amend on July 15, 2024. (ECF No. 10). Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint on September 9, 2024. (ECF No. 13). Along with his complaint, Plaintiff also filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) in this action (ECF No. 2), which the Court granted on December 28, 2023 (ECF No. 7). Because the Court concludes that Plaintiff had at…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.