Adams

(PC) Molina v. Adams

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 1, 20251:24-cv-00019California3,448 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSHUA JOHAN MOLINA, Case No.: 1:24-cv-00019-CDB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO COMPEL

v.

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

ADAMS, FOR COUNSEL

Defendant. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER

16 (Doc. 31)

Plaintiff Joshua Johan Molina is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND On December 29, 2023, Plaintiff filed his complaint initiating this action. (Doc. 1). The case was transferred to the Fresno Division on February 4, 2024, and assigned to the undersigned. (Doc. 4). The action was stayed on July 3, 2024, to facilitate possible early alternative dispute resolution. (Doc. 16). On July 8, 2024, the stay was lifted (Doc. 21) and a discovery and scheduling order was issued (Doc. 22). Pursuant to the scheduling order, the deadline to complete discovery was March 8, 2025,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.