(PC) Cone v. Gamble III

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 1, 20251:24-cv-00799California729 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRIS MONROE CONE, Case No. 1:24-cv-00799-KES-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

SUPPLEMENT COMPLAINT

v. (ECF No. 26) GAMBLE III, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Chris Monroe Cone (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 2, 2024, the Court screened Plaintiff’s second amended complaint and issued findings and recommendations that this action proceed against Defendant Gamble for excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment for the incident on April 29, 2024, but all other claims and defendants be dismissed based on Plaintiff’s failure to state claims upon which relief may be granted. (ECF No. 21.) Following the filing of Plaintiff’s objections, (ECF Nos. 24, 25), those findings and recommendations remain pending before the assigned District Judge. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s filing of April 29, 2024,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.