Leonard

Leonard v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 1, 20255:24-cv-06280California1,077 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 CHERI LEONARD, Case No. 5:24-cv-06280-EJD

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

STAY DISCOVERY PENDING

v. MOTION TO DISMISS

CVS PHARMACY, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 50 Defendants.

Defendants CVS Pharmacy, Inc. (“CVS”), Amneal Pharmaceuticals of New York, LLC, and Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC (collectively, “Amneal”) (all together, “Defendants”) move to stay discovery pending resolution of their motion to dismiss (“MTD”). Mot. to Stay, ECF No. 50; MTD, ECF No. 47. Plaintiff Cheri Leonard (“Plaintiff”) filed an opposition, and Defendants filed a reply. Opp’n, ECF No. 52; Reply, ECF No. 55. Upon careful review of the relevant documents, the Court finds this matter suitable for decision without oral argument pursuant to Local Rule 7-9(b). For the reasons explained below, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ motion to stay discovery pending resolution of the MTD. I. BACKGROUND …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.