Wiese

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 OPTRASCAN, INC., Case No. 24-cv-07979-PCP

Plaintiff,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

v.

DANIEL WIESE, et al., Defendants.

12 On March 3, 2025 Plaintiff Optrascan, Inc. filed three notices with the Court related to the issuance of letters rogatory to the appropriate judicial authority of South Africa. Shortly thereafter, the Court advised Optrascan that it should re-file these notices as a motion stating the specific relief it seeks. Dkt. No. 16. Optrascan never filed said motion. Then, on May 1, 2025, the Court held a joint case management conference in this case. This hearing had initially been scheduled for February 18, 2025, but the Court re-scheduled the hearing to May 1, 2025 at Optrascan’s request. Neither party appeared at the case management conference, nor did any party file a case management statement. Pursuant to Rule 41(b), a district court may sua sponte dismiss an action for failure to prosecute or comply with a court order. See Link v. Wabash R.R., 370…