Brar
Brar v. State of California
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TANBEER SINGH BRAR, Case No. 1:25-cv-00136-JLT-CDB
Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION
v. (Doc. 30) STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
Defendant. 16 Tanbeer Singh Brar filed this suit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in an attempt to hold the State of California liable for violating his right to privacy under the Fourth Amendment. He contends that since July 2021, the County of Kern and State of California “law enforcement agencies and officials are violating [his] online privacy and policy of [his] phones and computers.” (Doc. 1 at 5.) After considering Plaintiff’s application for emergency relief and having conducted a preliminary review of Plaintiff’s complaint, on March 10, 2025, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations to deny Plaintiff’s motion for emergency temporary protective order1 and ordered Plaintiff to show cause in writing why the action should not be dismissed as time-barred. (Doc. 9.) The magistrate judge noted…