Brar

Brar v. State of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 1, 20251:25-cv-00136California974 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TANBEER SINGH BRAR, Case No. 1:25-cv-00136-JLT-CDB

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

RECONSIDERATION

v. (Doc. 30) STATE OF CALIFORNIA,

Defendant. 16 Tanbeer Singh Brar filed this suit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in an attempt to hold the State of California liable for violating his right to privacy under the Fourth Amendment. He contends that since July 2021, the County of Kern and State of California “law enforcement agencies and officials are violating [his] online privacy and policy of [his] phones and computers.” (Doc. 1 at 5.) After considering Plaintiff’s application for emergency relief and having conducted a preliminary review of Plaintiff’s complaint, on March 10, 2025, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations to deny Plaintiff’s motion for emergency temporary protective order1 and ordered Plaintiff to show cause in writing why the action should not be dismissed as time-barred. (Doc. 9.) The magistrate judge noted…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.