Kenneth Boyman v. Dolly M. Gee

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 1, 20252:25-cv-02363California337 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No. 2:25-cv-02363-CBM-BFM Date May 1, 2025

Title Kenneth Boyman v. Dolly M. Gee et al

Present: The Honorable CONSUELO B. MARSHALL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

V.R. VALLERY NOT REPORTED

Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendant:

NONE PRESENT NONE PRESENT

Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS- ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL OF ACTION Judges enjoy judicial immunity, a “sweeping form of immunity” meant to “protect[] judicial independence by insulating judges from vexatious actions prosecuted by disgruntled litigants.” Forrester v. White, 484 U.S. 219, 225 (1988). Judicial immunity applies except in actions related to (1) “actions not taken in the judge’s judicial capacity” and (2) “actions, though judicial in nature, taken in the complete absence of all jurisdiction.” □□□□□□□ v. Waco, 502 U.S. 9, 11 (1991). Plaintiff originally filed this action in state court, which was removed to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.