Kenneth Boyman v. Dolly M. Gee
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 1, 20252:25-cv-02363California337 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Case No. 2:25-cv-02363-CBM-BFM Date May 1, 2025
Title Kenneth Boyman v. Dolly M. Gee et al
Present: The Honorable CONSUELO B. MARSHALL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
V.R. VALLERY NOT REPORTED
Deputy Clerk Court Reporter
Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendant:
NONE PRESENT NONE PRESENT
Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS- ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL OF ACTION Judges enjoy judicial immunity, a “sweeping form of immunity” meant to “protect[] judicial independence by insulating judges from vexatious actions prosecuted by disgruntled litigants.” Forrester v. White, 484 U.S. 219, 225 (1988). Judicial immunity applies except in actions related to (1) “actions not taken in the judge’s judicial capacity” and (2) “actions, though judicial in nature, taken in the complete absence of all jurisdiction.” □□□□□□□ v. Waco, 502 U.S. 9, 11 (1991). Plaintiff originally filed this action in state court, which was removed to…