Sacramento Homeless Union v. City of Sacramento

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SACRAMENTO HOMELESS UNION, et No. 2:22-cv-01095-TLN-CSK al., 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER v.

CITY OF SACRAMENTO,

15 Defendant. 16 17 This matter is before the Court on Defendant City of Sacramento’s (the “City”) Motion to Modify the Scheduling Order. (ECF No. 101.) Plaintiffs Sacramento Homeless Union, Betty Rios, Donta Williams, and Falisha Scott (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed an opposition. (ECF No. 103.) The City filed a reply. (ECF No. 106.) For the reasons set forth below, the City’s motion is DENIED. /// /// /// /// /// /// I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND A full recitation of the factual background is not necessary as the facts are set forth fully in the Court’s prior order. (ECF No. 22.) In short, this case arises from the City’s alleged failure to protect unhoused individuals during Sacramento’s triple-digit heat waves. (ECF No. 1.) This case began almost three years ago, on June 24, 2022, when Plaintiffs filed the…