Greer

Greer v. PowerSchool Holdings, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 2, 20253:25-cv-00995California1,440 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

BACKGROUND

On February 20, 2025, Kim Greer (the “Plaintiff”) filed a putative class action against Defendants regarding a cybersecurity incident that Defendants experienced in 2024. (See Docket Entry 1 (the “Complaint”) at 1-56.) On March 11, 2025, Defendants, with Plaintiff’s consent, moved to extend their time to respond to the Docket Entry page citations utilize the CM/ECF footer’s pagination. Complaint until the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation rules on a pending motion to transfer and consolidate multiple putative class actions against Defendants regarding the incident. (See Docket Entry 7 at 1-5.) On March 12, 2025, the Court granted that request. (See Docket Entry 8 at 1-2.) On March 13, 2025, Defendants filed the Disclosure Statements. (See Docket Entries 11-12.) As relevant here, the Court’s form Corporate Disclosure Statement directs each non-governmental artificial entity to complete the disclosure form and notes that “counsel have a continuing duty to update th[e] information” in the form. (Docket Entry 11 at 1 (all-cap font omitted); accord Docket Entry 12 at 1 (all-cap font omitted).) Question 2 on this form asks…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.