Lester

(PS) Mandujano v. Lester

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 1, 20252:23-cv-02385California419 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 YANAH MANDUJANO, No. 2:23-cv-02385-DJC-CKD PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS KATHERINE LESTER, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff filed a pro se civil complaint and this matter was referred to the undersigned by Local Rule 302(c)(21) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). By order filed March 25, 2025, the Court granted defendants Katherine Lester, City of Davis, and Rob Bonta’s motions to dismiss plaintiff Yanah Mandujano’s first amended complaint (“FAC”). (ECF No. 36.) Plaintiff’s FAC was found not to state any claim but he was given thirty days leave to file an amended complaint. The time granted has expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, or otherwise responded to the court’s order. In recommending this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute, the court has considered “(1) the public’s interest in expeditious resolution of litigation; (2) the court’s need to manage its docket; (3) the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.