Pettus

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RADNI GHAFOORI, No. 2:24-cv-2930 DC AC PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER DEPUTY LELAND PETTUS,

LIEUTENANT KIELY BRANDON,

DEPUTY GEORGE CROWLEY, JUDGE LINDA A. McFADDEN, 16 Defendants. 17 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was accordingly referred to the undersigned by E.D. Cal. 302(c)(21). This case was initially filed in the Fresno Division of the Eastern District of California, and plaintiff was granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1) prior to the case being transferred to the Sacramento Division. ECF Nos. 3, 4. The case is now before the undersigned for the screening process associated with IFP status, discussed below. Additionally, plaintiff has moved to supplement his complaint. ECF No. 10. Because the undersigned will provide plaintiff with an opportunity to file an amended complaint, that motion is GRANTED, and plaintiff may incorporate any additional…