(PS) Gray v. City of Roseville

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BOBBY DEAN GRAY III, Case No. 2:25-cv-00535-TLN-JDP Plaintiff, v. ORDER CITY OF ROSEVILLE, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff initiated this civil action without counsel. Accordingly, the matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge under Local Rule 302. On April 4, 2025, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed. The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court . . . .”). Having reviewed the…