Bondi

Velasquez Murcia v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 2, 202524-1250California851 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 2 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CRISTIAN NAHUM VELASQUEZ No. 24-1250 MURCIA; TANIA ESTELA PAZ Agency Nos.

RIVERA; D.N.V.P., A220-602-636

A220-940-573

Petitioners,

A220-940-574

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 11, 2025** San Francisco, California

Before: S.R. THOMAS, PAEZ, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

Cristian Nahum Velasquez Murcia, his partner Tania Estela Paz Rivera, and

their minor daughter petition for review of an order by the Board of Immigration

Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing their appeal from an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”)

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). decision denying asylum, withholding of removal, and protection…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.