Bondi
Velasquez Murcia v. Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 2, 202524-1250California851 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 2 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CRISTIAN NAHUM VELASQUEZ No. 24-1250 MURCIA; TANIA ESTELA PAZ Agency Nos.
RIVERA; D.N.V.P., A220-602-636
A220-940-573
Petitioners,
A220-940-574
v.
MEMORANDUM*
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted April 11, 2025** San Francisco, California
Before: S.R. THOMAS, PAEZ, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.
Cristian Nahum Velasquez Murcia, his partner Tania Estela Paz Rivera, and
their minor daughter petition for review of an order by the Board of Immigration
Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing their appeal from an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”)
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). decision denying asylum, withholding of removal, and protection…