People v. Summerville CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 2, 2025C100754California3,735 words

Opinion

Opinion

Eurie, J.

Filed 5/2/25 P. v. Summerville CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento) ----

THE PEOPLE, C100754

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. Nos. 23FE015111, 23FE015112) v.

DOMINIC SUMMERVILLE,

Defendant and Appellant.

Defendant Dominic Summerville pled no contest to stalking and vandalism in a consolidated case. The court sentenced him to two years of probation. Summerville appeals claiming the trial court abused its discretion when it found he was an unreasonable risk to public safety and denied his petition for mental health diversion. We will affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

From October 2022 to September 2023 Summerville had several incidents with his family and a neighbor. He would…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.