Edward Schad v. Charles Ryan

Good Law
732 F.3d 946·2013 WL 5525722·2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 20451
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 7, 201313-16978California633 words

Opinion

Opinion

Plaintiff-Appellant Edward Schad is scheduled to be executed on October 9, 2013, in Arizona for the 1978 murder of Lorimer Grove. His efforts to reopen the district court’s 2006 habeas judgment by invoking Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) have been the subject of another appeal, No. 13-16895, in a separate district court action. In our opinion, we affirmed the district court’s denial of relief and recounted the long history of this litigation. Schad v. Ryan, No. 13-16895, 732 F.3d 963, 964-66 , 2013 WL 5498094, at *1-2 (9th Cir. Oct. 4, 2013).

Schad filed this action in district court prior to his clemency hearing, which took place on October 2, 2013. He unsuccessfully sought to enjoin the hearing and to stay his execution, claiming that the Clemency Board was biased and subject to undue pressure by the Governor in violation of due process. The Clemency Board in Arizona is appointed by the Governor and issues recommendations to the Governor. The Governor may grant clemency only when the Board recommends it. Ariz.Rev. Stat. § 31-402(A).

The Supreme Court has never recognized a case in which clemency proceedings conducted pursuant to a state’s executive powers have…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.