People v. Bowen CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 5, 2025C098347California2,836 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 5/5/25 P. v. Bowen CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Shasta) ----

THE PEOPLE, C098347

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 22F3835)

v.

DENVER EDWARD BOWEN,

Defendant and Appellant.

Defendant Denver Edward Bowen appeals a final judgment following a jury trial convicting him of possessing and transporting controlled substances. He argues there was insufficient evidence to convict him under Health and Safety Code sections 11352 and 11379,1 because he contends that the element of “transport for sale” requires that a defendant be actively transporting a controlled substance for an immediate sale. We disagree and find that there was sufficient evidence to convict him of transporting

…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.