Tillinghast

Tillinghast v. L.A. Unified Sch. Dist.

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 5, 2025B332299California2,314 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wiley, J.

Filed 5/5/2025

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION EIGHT

MARK TILLINGHAST, B332299

Plaintiff and Respondent, Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC669592 v.

LOS ANGELES UNIFIED

SCHOOL DISTRICT,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, H. Chester Horn, Jr., Judge. Affirmed. Huarte Appeals, Anne M. Huarte for Plaintiff and Respondent. Artiano Shinoff, Paul V. Carelli, IV for Defendant and Appellant. ____________________ Maxwell Tillinghast collapsed at Palms Middle School. The 911 operator asked if the school had a defibrillator. Teachers desperately trying to resuscitate the 13 year old said no. In fact, the school did have one. It was in the main office, but no one ever told the teachers. Tillinghast would have had a 90% chance of survival if defibrillated within three minutes. Without the defibrillator, Tillinghast died. The school had the equipment to save Tillinghast’s life. Teachers were trained to use it. They just did not know it was there. The jury awarded Tillinghast’s father $15 million for the preventable loss…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.