Singh

Singh v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 5, 202524-399California2,867 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 5 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JATINDER SINGH, No. 24-399 Agency No. Petitioner, A201-738-845 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted March 24, 2025 Phoenix, Arizona

Before: BERZON and BENNETT, Circuit Judges, and TUNHEIM, District Judge.** Partial Dissent by Judge BENNETT.

Jatinder Singh is a citizen of India who entered the United States without

inspection after having been previously removed. The Department of Homeland

Security (“DHS”) reinstated Singh’s prior removal order. Singh expressed a fear of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable John R. Tunheim, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, sitting by designation. persecution and torture by the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (“BJP”) if returned to

India, which triggered…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.