People v. Twine CA1/3
Opinion
Opinion
Filed 5/5/25 P. v. Twine CA1/
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION THREE
THE PEOPLE,
Plaintiff and Respondent,
A169814
v. EDWARD TWINE, (Alameda County Super. Ct. No. 21CR009285) Defendant and Appellant.
Defendant Edward Twine appeals a judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of murder and other offenses. His sole contention on appeal is that the trial court abused its discretion in limiting expert testimony of his mental deficits, which he offered to support his defense that he did not act with implied malice or reckless indifference to human life. We affirm.
FACTUAL AND PROCDURAL BACKGROUND
I. The Crime and Investigation
The victim of defendant’s crimes was Halia Gebrezghi. On the night of July 10, 2021,…