People v. Twine CA1/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 5, 2025A169814California5,112 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 5/5/25 P. v. Twine CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

A169814

v. EDWARD TWINE, (Alameda County Super. Ct. No. 21CR009285) Defendant and Appellant.

Defendant Edward Twine appeals a judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of murder and other offenses. His sole contention on appeal is that the trial court abused its discretion in limiting expert testimony of his mental deficits, which he offered to support his defense that he did not act with implied malice or reckless indifference to human life. We affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCDURAL BACKGROUND

I. The Crime and Investigation

The victim of defendant’s crimes was Halia Gebrezghi. On the night of July 10, 2021,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.