In re Sandisk SSDS Litigation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 2, 20253:23-cv-04152California1,662 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 In re SANDISK SSDs LITIGATION. Case No. 23-cv-04152-RFL (LJC)

ORDER RESOLVING JOINT

DISCOVERY LETTERS REGARDING

DEPOSITIONS

10 Re: Dkt. Nos. 152, 156

A. Deposition of David Goeckeler The Court previously struck a joint letter regarding Plaintiffs’ request to depose SanDisk CEO David Goeckeler and Defendants’ arguments that Plaintiffs had not shown sufficient cause to depose that “apex” witness. ECF No. 150. In doing so, the Court provided guidance for any renewed letter on that topic. First, the Court advised the parties that “this Court does not take a formalistic approach to the ‘apex doctrine’ imposing strict requirements of exhaustion or unique knowledge before such a deposition will be permitted, although such considerations may be relevant factors,” and that the “Court recognizes that in typical, ordinary circumstances deposing a large company’s chief executive imposes a substantial burden.” Id. at 1–2 (citing In re Uber Techs., Inc.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.