Hill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 PAMELA HILL, et al., Case No. 24-cv-00336-JSC

Plaintiffs,

ORDER RE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION

v. TO DISMISS AND STRIKE

PLAINTIFFS’ THIRD AMENDED

PACIFIC MARITIME ASSOCIATION, et COMPLAINT al., Re: Dkt. No. 115 Defendants.

12 Plaintiffs allege Defendants failed to provide them sick pay and leave and retaliated against a subset of them in violation of California state and municipal laws. (Dkt. No. 110.) Defendants move to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and move to strike certain class allegations under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(f). (Dkt. No. 115.) Having carefully reviewed the parties’ briefing and with the benefit of oral argument on May 1, 2025, the Court GRANTS in part the motion to dismiss and DENIES the motion to strike. LEGAL STANDARD A complaint must contain a “short and plain statement of the…